In some cases, the reason might be that the body corporate has not met its obligation to obtain the mandatory 3-yearly replacement cost valuation – this usually leads to over-escalating the sum insured by applying the same “on-the-safe-side” escalation rate of 10% year after year. A professional insurance valuation would remedy this effect and save the body corporate more money than what it costs.
In converse, a valuer with sufficient professional indemnity insurance affords trustees the peace of mind of having an avenue of recourse in the event of a shortfall in claim payout due to negligence on the part of the valuer. Valuers that are under-qualified and under-insured tend to over-estimate a building’s replacement cost to avoid any recourse being taken against them.
Our advice:
Don’t avoid the insurance valuation just because you are concerned about the cost!
Click here to find out why you can trust Mirfin’s valuers.
1. How much professional indemnity cover does the valuer hold? (Benchmark: 10% of the building’s replacement value, but minimum R20 million).
2. How many community schemes has the valuer valued in the past 30 days? (Benchmark: at least 50 – 100 complexes per month).
Cookies are necessary to operate this website. You may withdraw your consent to cookies at any time by selecting/setting your preferences on your user profile.
In order to proceed with using Mirfin's website, it is mandatory to accept cookies. You may withdraw your consent to cookies at any time by setting your preferences on your user profile.